|
Media Articles on Law Firm
Farmers
Beat City
Judge says farmers not to blame for flooding
By Victoria Manley
Register-Pajaronian
Monday, November 30, 1998
WATSONVILLE Farmers are not to blame for flooding problems when they
haven't changed their general practices, a superior court judge ruled
last week, giving a victory to local growers who were sued by city
officials as the culprit for causing floods in town three years ago.
Farmers of more than 430 acres in the southeast end of Watsonville were
vindicated in a civil suit when Santa Cruz County Superior Court Judge
Robert Yonts ruled they were not to blame for increased flooding.
Dick Peixoto of Peixoto Farms, one of the defendants in the case filed
last March, said the ruling was that farmers being sued hadn't really
changed any of their practices and so flooding couldn't have been their
fault.
"Farming is exempt when other factors change around them," Peixoto
said. "We didn't really change. In the `70s, it's the city that went
and built in our flow line."
Yonts heard the case Nov. 23, and came back with his decision the day
after, Peixoto said.
City officials claimed that changes in farming practices had resulted
in increased flooding in 1995 according to the suit, recent changes in
land grading, crops, farming methods and drainage channels have all
resulted in a significant increase in the amount of flow rates during
storms.
The city reportedly settled out of court with Coastal Berry Co., who
grows strawberries on the Franich property, the primary parcel blamed
for contributing to the floods.
Coastal Berry Co. Manager Alan Thorne was unavailable for comment.
Floods were primarily due to the reawakening of the land on that
property after it was dormant for years without any cultivation
cultivating it for agricultural use required growers to build a ditch
and level the field, spurring water runoff, Peixoto said.
The suit asked the court to issue preliminary and permanent injunctions
that would require the farmers to modify their properties and farming
practices, which they said were intended to reduce the amount of
runoff, which carries topsoil, silt, excess water and other debris into
the city and into the Bay Village and Pajaro Village subdivisions.
the city also sought a fiscal compensation in the amount of $5,000 to
$7,000 per flooding event; according to Watsonville City Attorney Alan
Smith, there have been 13 separate flooding events since 1995.
Neither Smith nor David Koch, director of the city's public works and
utilities department, were available for comment.
Back
|